securityos/node_modules/eslint-plugin-jest/docs/rules/prefer-expect-resolves.md

61 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

2024-09-06 15:32:35 +00:00
# Prefer `await expect(...).resolves` over `expect(await ...)` syntax (`prefer-expect-resolves`)
🔧 This rule is automatically fixable by the
[`--fix` CLI option](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/command-line-interface#--fix).
<!-- end auto-generated rule header -->
When working with promises, there are two primary ways you can test the resolved
value:
1. use the `resolve` modifier on `expect`
(`await expect(...).resolves.<matcher>` style)
2. `await` the promise and assert against its result
(`expect(await ...).<matcher>` style)
While the second style is arguably less dependent on `jest`, if the promise
rejects it will be treated as a general error, resulting in less predictable
behaviour and output from `jest`.
Additionally, favoring the first style ensures consistency with its `rejects`
counterpart, as there is no way of "awaiting" a rejection.
## Rule details
This rule triggers a warning if an `await` is done within an `expect`, and
recommends using `resolves` instead.
Examples of **incorrect** code for this rule
```js
it('passes', async () => {
expect(await someValue()).toBe(true);
});
it('is true', async () => {
const myPromise = Promise.resolve(true);
expect(await myPromise).toBe(true);
});
```
Examples of **correct** code for this rule
```js
it('passes', async () => {
await expect(someValue()).resolves.toBe(true);
});
it('is true', async () => {
const myPromise = Promise.resolve(true);
await expect(myPromise).resolves.toBe(true);
});
it('errors', async () => {
await expect(Promise.reject(new Error('oh noes!'))).rejects.toThrowError(
'oh noes!',
);
});
```